Category: paper
-
Byrne’s third argument for AHF, “Eve” and “Adam”
Remember that AHF is the thesis that Necessarily, something is a woman if and only if it is an adult human female. Let me unpack that “if and only if.” The above statement is really a conjunction of two claims, namely: 1. Necessarily, if something is a woman then it is an adult human female.…
-
Byrne’s second argument for AHF and analytic truths
Is a woman by definition an adult human female? If so, what is there to argue about?
-
Byrne’s first argument for AHF
Could all the dictionary authors be so mistaken?